×

21st century forest management

Forests provide numerous benefits to society.

Some benefits are financial, revolving around the economic goals of landowners and local and state economies.

Other benefits fall within the realm of aesthetics. Forests, especially this time of year, offer spectacular scenery that spurs many to visit northern Michigan.

But, at their core, forests are essential for many ecosystem functions, including regulating hydrology (water movement), stabilizing soils, and storing carbon.

Forests are also critical for maintaining biodiversity. Some of the species found in our local forests are well-known wildlife game species, while the vast majority (both flora and fauna) are virtually unknown. Regardless, each and every species has a role within its ecosystem, and most forests encapsulate many different habitats for a range of wildlife species.

Active forest management is necessary for the conservation of many forest-dependent wildlife species.

Many wildlife species benefit from disturbances to the forest that remove only a small proportion of biomass and allow succession to move forward to a more mature and older forest condition.

From an ecological perspective, a forest is never “over mature,” but simply changing. Those older forests provide needs for innumerable wildlife species that benefit from older trees, some of which may be dying or dead already.

Conversely, other wildlife species benefit from forest treatments that remove a majority of the living material and initiate a young forest.

Regardless, habitat for any single forest species is nested within a broader forest ecosystem. Therefore, habitat management for a given wildlife species or forest product (such as sawtimber o pulpwood) can affect other landscape and stand-level biodiversity elements.

Forest management can have lasting impacts well beyond the goals and objectives that drive a given treatment.

Because forests develop more slowly than other terrestrial ecosystem types and may have conditions arising from forest treatments that can last for decades or longer, those interested in biodiversity are reminded that short-term successes based on optimizing objectives may yield long-term limitations.

For instance, forest management that maximizes the short-term financial return may do so to the detriment of long-term economic potentials: Cutting all the good timber in one treatment may derail the ability to put into action future treatments.

Or, forest management that maximizes the production of any single wildlife species may limit the range of habitats available to other species.

And, since nearly every tree species that comprise our forests has a lifespan greater than any of us (sometimes up to many centuries), the timeframe that forests work within often puzzles us. Too often, we force our human expectations on our forests.

Traditional approaches to forest management and wildlife habitat management were developed by Gifford Pinchot, Aldo Leopold, and others, when the global human population was a third of what it is today and stressors from invasive species, other land uses, and climate change were not as pervasive.

Now, in the 21st century, forest biodiversity challenges require a new working model: ecological forestry.

For those managing forests, contemporary biodiversity challenges require us to think more broadly about the past, consider what actions or processes produced the forests we now have, and evaluate post-treatment conditions of forest structure, composition, and function.

The need to evaluate the potential biodiversity effects of forest management has led to the development of forest certification programs and related biodiversity metrics. Forest management approaches within a biodiversity context have likewise been developed based on our growing understanding of how landscapes and forests function.

Originally developed alongside efforts to maintain forest complexity and conserve the northern spotted owl in the Pacific Northwest of the United States, many advances in ecological forestry are associated with the growing appreciation and understanding of natural models of disturbances to which silvicultural practices can be compared.

Ecological forestry has developed the following precepts: 1.), context: the importance of planning and management at larger scales, 2.), continuity: the maintenance of forest structure, function, and biota between pre- and postharvest ecosystems, 3.) complexity: the need to create and maintain structural and compositional complexity and biological diversity, including spatial heterogeneity at multiple spatial scales, and 4) timing: the importance of applying silvicultural treatments at ecologically appropriate time intervals.

Future articles will review those four precepts and provide examples relevant to those working and enjoying forests of northern Michigan.

Greg Corace is the forester for the Alpena-Montmorency Conservation District. He can be reached at greg.corace@macd.org or 989-356-3596, ext. 102.

Newsletter

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *
   

Starting at $4.62/week.

Subscribe Today