Letters To Ed :-)

Does WAR factor into your narrow view of economic disaster?

Which WAR has been worse for America? Which WAR cost most American lives? Which WAR was initiated by the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld gang? Of course, both, and both.

Dense understanding on the part of "free"man...the economy of the last 30 years, which you purport to understand have been disastrous for the middle class! If YOU do not understand, and I tell you where to find information, the onus is on YOU. Responding to YOUR narrow view on the issue is like answering the leading question "have you stopped beating your wife?"

The economic crash of 2007/8 has root causes in both houses, right and left.

Sound money at the federal level, the ease of credit requirements in the private sector and the foolish risks of the financial sector caused the problems we face now.

Our friend did not read the article I cited, he just saw a "dis" on Clinton in the title and left it at that. Some people don't want to understand, they just want to convince or sway others to their point of view. I make statements to "germinate" conversation and discussion. Normy just whips out retread talking points and thinks he's the new Ed Schulz.

normy just cannot support his positions. There, simply, is no scenario in which the U.S. comes out of this debt debacle without mucho pain. Not while the federal government seems to be, almost intentionally, trying to hamper a grass roots recovery.

Thanks Freeman. I sometimes grow weary of levels of stupidity that reach the stratosphere. Don't be such a stranger.

Maybe Jaxspp will volunteer to teach you about sources normanlake.

Does "credibility" lend itself to your liberal friend's disregard for the law requiring a budget?

,,, forgive me if I don't hold my breath,,,

Let's see, "right wing hack economists". OK, read the article and point out what you think is erroneous and tell my why.

I'd like that "information".

"...Information, an eleven letter, four syllable word beyond your grasp..."

Apparently "information" is a bit beyond your "grasp" since you won't provide any.

Credibility must mean "read up on it", "too many to mention", etc.

Of course if you can't give us one piece of work that makes your point then I guess we'll just have to assume you really haven't "read up on it".

Who said Bush was a conservative?

Your views are your views, don't care. But you referenced "too many to mention", list ONE!!

I am not your teacher, not trying to teach you anything. You offered a point of view and I disagree. I cited a good piece of work that illustrates where I am coming from and you have cited nothing.

Cite something that makes sense and I'll read it and if I don't agree with it I'll give you the courtesy of telling you why. That's how big people discuss things normanlake.

You are NOT my teacher. I have been taught to think for myself, pretender. I need not answer to you. The truth is beyond your grasp, or you would see through the tired rhetoric you spew. Information, an eleven letter, four syllable word beyond your grasp.

My viewpoint is out here for you to see. You have no credibility.

AND, "free"man, not one word from you pathetic neocons about the liar Bush and his TWO UNfunded WARS! The Iraq WAR and the foray into Afghanistan has cost America far more than the disastrous trickle down economic theory, another well documented situation. The numbers are staggering, as well as the death toll of American troops, the wounded American troops, the mentally scarred American troops, as well as untold thousands of non~combatant Iraqis. Do not attempt to feed me any baloney about Conservatism, I know the results of blind adherence to ideology.

AS for Bush, who describes him as a conservative?

"read up on it", "find it yourself", "to many to mention".

Very convicing case you've outlined normanlake.

TOO many to mention, find it your "free"self, I did. The truth will set YOU 'free'.

THERE IT IS!!!!!

You guys are all alike.

CITE SOME WORK THAT YOU RELY ON OR STOP BAD MOUTHING THOSE WHO DO!!