Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 hours ago.
by jaxspp
rshill7
#1

Letters To Ed :-)

"We've been duped by the Republicans. Kentucky Sen. and minority leader Mitch McConnell in a news conference one day after the election, stated that the single and sole goal of the GOP over the next two years is: to make Barack Obama a single term president. What an arrogant and obnoxious goal and statement. There agenda before the election was to get votes by promising that there first goals were jobs, the economy and health care reform. It seems their goal is to grab power, not to do things for the people that are in need of jobs and or unemployment pay, health care for those that don't have it, and the people losing their homes. This is the same party that wanted the auto plants and their suppliers to go out of business. We are just coming back from what they did to this country, and now we have them back to do the same things to our country again. What a mess the next two years is going to bring to this country. Talk about partisanship." Carl D. Leow Rogers Cit

 
 

Member Comments

HuronHippie

And if minimum wages are to be raised, it must be done gradually, so the inflation is gradual and it won't be hyperinflation. Bottom line is, higher wages = higher prices, so nobody wins, really. But if you want it...

Posted 436 days ago.

HuronHippie

Besides, wages are a relative thing. In some parts of the country, prices are very high. In others, such as Alpena, they are depressed. You have to let the market decide wages: you cannot rubber stamp wages and prices or you end up like the USSR.

Posted 436 days ago.

HuronHippie

And by the way, Norman, I am BARELY scraping by as it is.

Posted 436 days ago.

HuronHippie

Norman: I would suggest you google the cost of living in Australia vs. the US. You will find that ALL prices are 40-50% higher there than in the US. Sure, we could raise our minimum wage by 50%. But guaranteed, there would be either massive inflation or mass business closings in a very short time. You do not understand if you are not a small businessman ... PERIOD! I once shared your view before I was a businessman.

Posted 436 days ago.

normanlake

ACTUAL instances of verifiable 'voter fraud', so miniscule they could all be contained in a brain the size of a period. Between 200 and 2007, there were 32, 299 UFO sightings, 352 deaths by lightning, and 9 (yes, nine) verifiable instances of voter impersonation. The GOP 'solution' to all this activity, make sure LESS people vote, in particular minorities and Democrats. Of course, the GOP calls in all those UFO sightings. Deny as only rshrill can, the voter fraud 'problem' is virtually NON-existent. Deja vu? Yes, we have all talked about this baloney before, and the issue has been debunked. But of course, it's all about 'jobs'.

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

I cannot say you are vastly uninformed, I MUST say you are gladly Misinformed. Both cases illustrate a lack of understanding of anything other than a basic third grade comprehension.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

They can die with themselves too.

Here's one way we should most assuredly beat your side to a bloody pulp: A Civil War. My side versus yours.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

Fraudsters could waltz right in and withdraw whatever they wanted.

5. We can't be made to show ID's. It's voter suppression. Now THAT is what the word phony was invented to describe. I shouldn't be expected t like it when one cheating lady can cancel the votes of my entire family should I? No. My side should be able to win with 51% of the eligible vote. It should take no more than that. We should be able to win by one eligible vote. We need waaaaay much more than that. We need to also account for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of fraudulent votes.

When the other side, yours, has no morals whatever (and you know it), has no qualms about lying and cheating to get what they want, it's truly amazing we can ever win. I suppose we should also be forced to gamble every dime we've made playing cards with a card shark. To your side, the end has always justified the means, regardless of what means must be used. Yeah, they can still live with themselves.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

1. Truth? You should be able to mention at least one true statement Obama made about his healthcare law then. He is the absolute pinnacle (pinochle) of your side. Truth never comes into play with him. It never comes into play with Reid or Pelosi either.

2. D1ckhead is an observation of my own.

3. I guess Australia doesn't have Obama as President, nor Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, or Durbin, as anything. Makes a huge difference. The aforementioned are domestic enemies of the USA, yet are in leadership positions. Captains and Lieutenants endeavoring to sink the very ship they sail. Parasites living on the upcoming death of their host.

3. What's the objection to voters showing eligibility? A simple ID? Where's the problem? Everyone has to have an ID, for everything. Why can't they show it? The only reason that makes any sense at all, is FRAUD.

4. If folks didn't have to show ID's at banks, ya' reckon we'd still have any banks? Nope.

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

"Republicans cannot win legitimately". Right, that explains GOP induced blockage of minority voters (read Democratic voters).OOOHHHH, it's the ID they tell us, as if the urine was rain.

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

Explain this Capitalist Swine. In Australia, the minimum wage is Sixteen Dollars per hour, and they have low unemployment relative to America. It is the ONLY rich country that has avoided the Global Recession. Job Creators? Workers are the true job creators.

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

dickhead?!! Is that from your King James fantasy bible?

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

MY side is TRUTH, a subject you know little about. Keep repeating your same tired debunked narrative, and keep truth at bay, as usual.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

Your filthy side has roving bands of voters who go from poll to poll in buses voting all day long. Many vote absentee and locally in person. They present no proof whatsoever that they are even eligible.

So you have non-eligible voters voting straight democrat ticket all day long every election cycle. Republicans cannot win legitimately, because the field is illegitimate. They always have to have enough of a cushion to overcome the constant fraud from your sick side of socialist sycophants.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

Numbers are not like opinions. Numbers are exact. Finite. Not subject to interpretation, d1ckhead.

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

'Numbers', numbskull. You find 'numbers' to suit your sophomoronic take on the state of affairs in American politics. There is no 'there' there to coin a phrase.

Posted 437 days ago.

normanlake

39 years ago today Richard M. Nixon resigned in disgrace, one year after his Vice President, Spiro T. Agnew resigned also in disgrace. That was the high point for the Republican Party, which has rapidly declined from then on to the present day disgrace.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

All of the rest of the fraud cannot be detected because so many states allowed absolutely anyone to vote with no method whatsoever in place to either catch or prevent it. That's the field of play your side demands. Without cheating and fraud, your side would lose consistently.

Make fraud ridiculously easy and nearly impossible to detect or locate, then turn the commies loose on the polls! They have no consciences. They are group of God booing, God evicting, scumbags. So are you.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

Your side had people prosecuted for voting six times. That one person disenfranchised six other people. If that isn't fraud, what is? Your side broke election laws all over the place and several have had charges filed against them, including those in authority. And you have the audacity to use the word "facts".

A fact is whatever your side says it is. To non-commie crooks, those facts are simply lies. That is all your side has.

Oh, they also have you, which in addition to their lies, is nothing.

Posted 437 days ago.

rshill7

I didn't "interpret" anything Normanchild, I simply looked at the resulting numbers. They are impossible. Do you understand impossible? No, because you're impossibly stupid.

Posted 437 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or