Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by normanlake
rshill7
#1

Letters To Ed :-)

"We've been duped by the Republicans. Kentucky Sen. and minority leader Mitch McConnell in a news conference one day after the election, stated that the single and sole goal of the GOP over the next two years is: to make Barack Obama a single term president. What an arrogant and obnoxious goal and statement. There agenda before the election was to get votes by promising that there first goals were jobs, the economy and health care reform. It seems their goal is to grab power, not to do things for the people that are in need of jobs and or unemployment pay, health care for those that don't have it, and the people losing their homes. This is the same party that wanted the auto plants and their suppliers to go out of business. We are just coming back from what they did to this country, and now we have them back to do the same things to our country again. What a mess the next two years is going to bring to this country. Talk about partisanship." Carl D. Leow Rogers Cit

 
 

Member Comments

rshill7

Usually we do 7 or 8 stories per day. The latest one at this moment is about a young marine who will be receiving the Medal of Honor this coming Thursday: Lance Cpl. Kyle Carpenter.

Posted 77 days ago.

rshill7

The "Duck dudes" are beginning their sixth season. Mild ciphering tells me that'll be much more than a few more minutes of fame ahead. Each show will contain more than a few more minutes.

They are the highest rated show on cable. That means #1, just as Fox is the perpetual #1 news channel on cable, year after, year, after year.

Duck Dynasty...Faith, Fun, and Family.

You should search for shows that present...Atheism, Boredom, and Divorce.

Posted 77 days ago.

rshill7

Intelligent people are often in agreement. You must be saying we need some dumbasses to stop by so they can argue. Why do you think I mentioned you? It couldn't get much more dumbass than that. I approached the dumbest ass I know of.

Do you see a lot of conservatives over at HuffPo or Mother Jones? Most conservatives don't want to read what dumbasses say. The only reason intelligent fools and dumbasses appear together in this paper is they have the commonality of local news. In other words, we all live here. Get it?

There are many on the left however who love to run around and spread their own poop at conservative locales...I suppose as we become larger, we'll get those trolls too, although trolls (dumbasses), don't stay very long, as they are incapable of defending their own stupid Borg ideology.

You're welcome for the explanation.

Posted 77 days ago.

normanlake

I repeat....ZERO, nada, nil, none.NO discussion.

Posted 77 days ago.

normanlake

HERE is what you get with the site ...Sarah Palin, an extraordinary Lady. A new Duck guy running for Louisiana politics, one Zack Robertson, as if the Duck dudes have any minutes left, of fame. We get Laura Ingraham, a FOX pundit. We get Huckabee, Cruz, and ZERO discussion. Nice effort (FAIL) at Fox redux.

Posted 77 days ago.

normanlake

I perused the aforementioned 'cogent' website. I did notice that ZERO discussion on the posted issues was presented. Tripe, SHRILL.

Posted 77 days ago.

rshill7

Thanks Michael. I'm guessing conservative tripe is the right kind of tripe? Please correct me if I'm right.

I'd never want to harm ya'...just want to disagree with ya'...ok? Anything right with that? I think so.

Come on over and disagree with me sometime. We haven't had any morons other than Jax once trying to defend Obooboo.

Smart sites tend to attract smart people. Honorable people. I rebutted him into a full nelson right off the bat, and he ran away with his foolish, ever-failing ideology between his legs. Probably went straight back to the stupid sites.

He's quite nearly as stupid as thou, yet every bit the brainwashed, but useless, idiot. A walking, sometimes talking, advertisement for conservatism.

Posted 78 days ago.

normanlake

"Tune in" to Politibrew for all the latest...'conservative' tripe.

Posted 78 days ago.

Posted 78 days ago.

amos57usa

notfreeman..If "that soldier" had been left behind and killed you would be screaming Banzai, Banzai, Banzai stupidly because you Chrislicans blame Barry for rain.

Aren't you going to defend Ric the loony bafoon Perry or are you afraid.

Posted 79 days ago.

rshill7

Today 6-14-14 is both Flag Day and the 239th Birthday of the U.S. Army.

God Bless America.

Posted 80 days ago.

rshill7

"ISIS Releases Statement: Tragedies Will Befall You"

PolitiBrew(dotcom)

Warning: Graphic Violent video there about how this group is behaving In Iraq.

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

The doctrine of "leave no one behind" does not mean sacrifice a whole platoon to get one man's body back.

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

Your argument really aggravates me.

Leaders make hard decisions. If I were President I would not have made that deal. They very well may have killed that soldier. That is the price of war. That sacrifice could very well, if not absolutely, save the lives of 100's of his fellow soldiers or, possibly, 1000's of innocent civilians.

What do you think we accept when we take the oath? We all know the risk. We accept that risk. You mentioned, I believe, that you were in the military; if that's true then you should know better.

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

My statement stands. I'd rather release those detainees than their commanders who will ABSOLUTELY enhance their effectiveness on the field. Strategy 101.

Do I want the prisoner home. Yes. Will I put 10 Americans in danger to get him? 100? 1000? Another 9/11 type attack? What's your price?

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

Never mind, I found it.

"...The Afghan high peace council has released over 500 Afghan and Pakistani Taliban prisoners during the past one and half year.

The militants were detained in connection to suicide attacks and other insurgency activities, and were released based on president Karzaiā€™s decrees and on the request of the Afghan high peace council...."

I guess I don't get your argument. The AFGHAN'S released the detainees in an effort to start talks. It failed and they went back to the fight and, undoubtedly, killed some Americans.

So that justifies the President releasing their commanders? Did you read that article? Are you that desperate?

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

"According to the documents obtained by 1TV, at least..." Please source this article so we can read it.

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

This administration is in so far over their head that it's starting to get real scary. I truly believe that the Pres. needs to clean house and get some competent advisers.

His current staff has thrown him under the bus so many times he's starting to look a bit "tread worn".

Posted 81 days ago.

Freeman

Lower taxes smaller government apparently puts you in the same category as nazis etc.

Jax. I don't think any of the detainees need to be released. In particular their top level commanders. Your argument is two wrongs make a right. I dismiss that.

So my objection to a bad deal means that I'm for cutting off his head? Again with YOU 100% or GUILTY OF THE MOST EXTREME ALTERNATIVE.

Smarten up jaxspp, that kind of B.S. is infantile.

Why keep taking Cantor's remarks out of context? That's a cheap shot. Read them in their entirety. Again, more B.S.

A republican economist? Trickle down? Let's see, under the democratic "stimulus" Wall Street and the Markets, (fund managers), have flourished while middle class has been decimated. Come on man. Time to get honest.

Posted 81 days ago.

Here are the Flunkies Fact-free talks about. Note part about high-lvel Taliban leaders.: "According to the documents obtained by 1TV, at least 224 Taliban militants including Pakistani nationals, who were arrested in connection to suicide attacks, were released on presidential decrees and on request of the Afghan high peace council.

"The militants were apparently released to help accelerate the Afghan peace talks with the Taliban group, however majority of those who were released by Afghan government, have returned back to battle field to fight Afghan and coalition security forces.

A number of high level Taliban leaders including close aides of the Taliban supreme leader Mullah Mohammad Omar were also among those who were released to assist Afghan peace talks."

Posted 81 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or