Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 days ago.
by Freeman
rshill7
#1

Letters To Ed :-)

"We've been duped by the Republicans. Kentucky Sen. and minority leader Mitch McConnell in a news conference one day after the election, stated that the single and sole goal of the GOP over the next two years is: to make Barack Obama a single term president. What an arrogant and obnoxious goal and statement. There agenda before the election was to get votes by promising that there first goals were jobs, the economy and health care reform. It seems their goal is to grab power, not to do things for the people that are in need of jobs and or unemployment pay, health care for those that don't have it, and the people losing their homes. This is the same party that wanted the auto plants and their suppliers to go out of business. We are just coming back from what they did to this country, and now we have them back to do the same things to our country again. What a mess the next two years is going to bring to this country. Talk about partisanship." Carl D. Leow Rogers Cit

 
 

Member Comments

It would have to be someone who doesn't know who Orly Taitz is, someone who doesn't know about your law breaking friends, and someone who doesn't understand a paranoid personality.

Posted 446 days ago.

You'll have a long, long, long long wait to find someone you can best in an argument here. It would have to be someone who doesn't know Washington Times and World Net Daily aren't sources, someone willing to change the subject with you after you retreat, and someone who doesn't understand your name calling is your sign of surrender.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

Milwaukee: 104 years since a Republican Mayor.

Newark: 101 years since a Republican Mayor.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

Sh*thole alert: It's been 82 years since Chicago had a Republican Mayor.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

Speaking of hollow shells, which the first 2,700 pages of O'commiecare is. Did the EPA start out with a war on coal? Did the Dept Of Education start out by indoctrinating students in leftist philosophy and Marxism? Did the IRS start out by targeting anti-Marxists? Did DHS start out by buying millions of rounds of ammo to use against against American Citizens in America? O'commiecare will morph in like fashion. The hope of your side, is it will morph into single payer...the Government.

Furthermore, where in the 2,700 pages of O'commiecare does it it give O'bastard the authority to change it willy nilly as it suits him? Where does it, as written, allow him to delay several parts of it for his own personally perceived political benefit?

And where in the Constitution does it give the A.G. or the President the power to ignore ANY laws, violating their "oaths", or in this case, oafs.

Shoot yourself down with those. I'm going to need someone worthy of debate. You are not him.

Posted 446 days ago.

"And where in the Constitution does it give the A.G. or the President the power to ignore ANY laws, violating their "oaths", or in this case, oafs"

Like when Bush/Gonzales turned America into a nation of torturers, is what I assume you are referring to.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

Speaking of hollow shells, which the first 2,700 pages of O'commiecare is. Did the EPA start out with a war on coal? Did the Dept Of Education start out by indoctrinating students in leftist philosophy and Marxism? Did the IRS start out by targeting anti-Marxists? Did DHS start out by buying millions of rounds of ammo to use against against American Citizens in America? O'commiecare will morph in like fashion. The hope of your side, is it will morph into single payer...the Government.

Furthermore, where in the 2,700 pages of O'commiecare does it it give O'bastard the authority to change it willy nilly as it suits him? Where does it, as written, allow him to delay several parts of it for his own personally perceived political benefit?

And where in the Constitution does it give the A.G. or the President the power to ignore ANY laws, violating their "oaths", or in this case, oafs.

Shoot yourself down with those. I'm going to need someone worthy of debate. You are not him.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

No, it looks like they fell on your hollow head.

Posted 446 days ago.

And as far as your family laughing like gibbering idiots, looks like the apples haven't fallen far from the tree.

Posted 446 days ago.

Is this vague?

"The law also spells out that the IRS can't use liens or levies as enforcement tools.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: The Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall not file notice of lien with respect to any property of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty imposed by this section … or levy on any such property with respect to such failure. "

Posted 446 days ago.

Explanation of what? You are the only one talking about the IRS in a non-Obamacare context. You change the subject, make a bunch of non-points, then act like you've proven something. You said a person could lose their home over Obamacare and were shown to be 100% wrong. I'll say you win to appease your paranoid personality.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

Sill waiting for your unlearned explanation. Was that it? I see the unlearned part, but no explanation.

Posted 446 days ago.

rshill7

Aaaaaaaahahahahahaha!

Posted 447 days ago.

Deflection. The RS Way, after being routinely shot down, to try to save face. We all see through it, but let him carry on, in a polite way to save his humiliation at losing every discussion.

Posted 447 days ago.

We had a topic, which was, Obamacare and the penalties for not complying. You were the one who brought up your law breaking friends which, while interesting, had nothing to do with Obamacare. Although we can assume these friends will not comply with this law either.

Posted 447 days ago.

rshill7

Neither does the story of my friends, dummy. You should study the concept of reading with comprehension, however taxing that concept might be to a head empty of all, save "American" Marxist propaganda and the furtherance thereof.

Please tell us what it does have to do with, since the story is plain that the Fed stole this money for no stated reason whatsoever.

Go ahead, I'm waiting for your unlearned explanation, demonstrating a brightly illuminated, lack of understanding. Thou simple Oaf.

Posted 447 days ago.

Now I understand. Your paranoia.

Posted 447 days ago.

Thanks for the post. It has nothing to do with the penalties for not paying the Obamacare tax, but why stay on topic?

Posted 447 days ago.

rshill7

The "chaplains" in question, were volunteers. Do you know what volunteer means? Freedom is freedom. Maybe you've heard of that too.

Freedom is neither free nor dumb. It also allows people to be non-free if they choose, as well as dumb.

We have a few examples of those who are both dumb, and covet subjugation.

Posted 447 days ago.

amos57usa

"The house voted to restore chaplins." (CNN) I guess combining church and state is more important than feeding children. No clergy should ever be paid for by the state. If house members want to play make believe let them reach into their own pocket to pay for the opiate of the masses.

Posted 447 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or